Recovery and evaluation
Researchers must evaluate every infectious disease response after the emergency has passed. This is an essential part of the recovery process and creates valuable evidence to improve future Australian and global emergency responses.
Publications
- Key lessons from the COVID-19 public health response in Australia
- HPeV3 diversity, recombination and clinical impact across 7-years: an Australian story
- Relative effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination with 3 compared to 2 doses against SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) among an Australian population with low prior rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection [preprint]
- People in intensive care with COVID-19: demographic and clinical features during the first, second, and third pandemic waves in Australia
- What is needed to sustain improvements in hospital practices post-COVID-19? A qualitative study of interprofessional dissonance in hospital infection prevention and control
- Entanglements of affect, space, and evidence in pandemic healthcare: An analysis of Australian healthcare workers’ experiences of COVID-19
- Australia needs a prioritised national research strategy for clinical trials in a pandemic: lessons learned from COVID-19
- How do data bolster pandemic preparedness and response? How do we improve data and systems to be better prepared?
- Early analysis of the Australian COVID-19 epidemic
- Outcomes reported for Australian First Nation populations for the influenza A(H1N1) 2009 pandemic and lessons for future infectious disease emergencies: a systematic review
- Causes and clinical features of childhood encephalitis: A multicenter, prospective cohort study
- Stakeholder Consultation Report – Australian Partnership for Preparedness Research on Infectious Disease Emergencies: NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence
- Is Australia prepared for the next pandemic?
- Developing research priorities for Australia’s response to infectious disease emergencies